By C. Hope Clark
Agents and publishers
love series, as do most readers. I’m chomping at the bit for suspense author
Lisa Gardner to release another Quincy and Rainie crime story. Gardner’s one of
the few mystery/suspense authors I’ll pre-order and not care what her new
release costs.
Many readers become
comfortable, friendly, even intimate with repeating characters, and remain
anxious to see what calamity an author can concoct for them next. That
challenge represents both the good and the bad of writing a series.
Initially, a series
seems the simplest way to go. You spend the first book introducing and defining
the basics of your protagonist: her relationships, upbringing, strengths, and
weaknesses. This is ground level construction where you’re laying the
foundation, and to your reader, it’s a honeymoon phase. You define her
environment, her habits. And with a mystery comes dictating the degree of
crime, level of gore, type of law enforcement, and the capabilities of your
sleuth to dance in and out of the confines of the law.
Then comes book two.
Your protagonist grew in the initial story. She’s different now, changed. You
now pen an intriguing plot nothing like the first, but more challenging than
the last, because your character has evolved. She’s wiser. Those around her
changed as well. Just like in the real world, they applied what they learned to
their new conditions. And they grow again.
Book three tests you.
Even if you have a bumbling sleuth, she won’t bumble exactly the same. She
reacts based on her history, and how it altered her. Here is where many authors
fall short. They forget that the reader has grown along with the character. He
won’t be deceived quite so easily, and reading inside your protagonist’s head
now for the third time, he’ll expect more from her, giving her less benefit of
the doubt. She can’t make the same mistakes. She can’t use the same
tactics.
By now you also have a
slew of characters to keep up with. If you’ve read a long-lived series comprised
of people like Sue Grafton’s Kinsey Millhone, Charlaine Harris’ Sookie
Stackhouse, or Janet Evanovich’s Stephanie Plum, you keep up with a huge host
of people who step in and out of the stories. Some appear once in a great
while, others in every other scene. People age or die. They change professions
or get divorced. They earn accolades and they screw up with long-lasting
effects. You must get the facts right, maintain the time line, preserve the
history, because your readers keep track.
The reader may know you
better that you know yourself now. Remember, mystery is the only genre where
the reader is pitted against the author, each trying to outguess the other.
Each book makes you up your game, because the reader is buying with an urge to
best you before you reach “the end.”
The quirks have to get
quirkier.
The needs have to feel
keener.
The love has to grow
deeper.
The past fears have to
scar.
The twists turn more
complex.
A series gets harder,
not easier, in spite of how well you think you know your players. It’s a
difficult balancing act, but in the end not only do you amass a loyal fan base
for the effort, but you also achieve a satisfaction in knowing you still have
what it takes to keep that reader guessing. And that’s the addiction that keeps
an author shrewd, savvy and alive.
________________________________________________________________________________
C. Hope Clark’s new release is Palmetto Poison, the
third in The Carolina Slade Mystery Series, from Bell Bridge Books. First in the series is Lowcountry Bribe followed by Tidewater Murder. Hope is
also editor of FundsforWriters.com, voted 101 Best Websites for
Writers by Writer’s Digest Magazine for the past 13 years. www.chopeclark.com
TWITTER - http://twitter.com/hopeclark
FACEBOOK - http://www.facebook.com/chopeclark
BLOG - http://www.chopeclark.com/blog
FACEBOOK - http://www.facebook.com/chopeclark
BLOG - http://www.chopeclark.com/blog
No comments:
Post a Comment